[New State] plan

Last update: November 27, 2023

• 1. Secure genetic integrity.
• 2. Manage capitalism to fulfill housing, healthcare, and suitable Mate needs.
• 3. Create a more objective form of government.
• 4. Balance the Mate Market to create true gender equality.

1. Secure Genetic Integrity.

For thousands of years, humans have been weighted down by genetic deficiencies and health challenges that cause dysfunction in the world. The goal of [New State] is to fix these problems so as to elevate humanity—up a level—and prepare people for the future challenges awaiting as a space-faring civilization. These fixes, improvements, and resulting benefits will be created by the teamwork of [New State] members. [New State] members will follow [New State] principles and values with the goal of producing higher-quality citizens each generation. Higher quality means being healthy, intelligent, attractive, and marketable.

Intelligent refers primarily to self-control, because there are people who can do well in school and perform well on an IQ test who also have poor judgment or irrational beliefs. Self-control regulates the emotions, enabling a person to reason more often as a default behavior, thus gaining conscious awareness and the independent ability to make moral decisions instead of blindly following popular belief.

Attractive: contrary to some people's beliefs, beauty is not in the eye of the beholder. Beauty is in the eyes of the intelligent. It takes both self-control and intelligence to notice details—color, alignment, proportion, shape, texture, etc. For example, a man who drinks alcohol develops weaker self-control, resulting in weaker beauty standards. Many women who feel unattractive tend to prefer men who drink. An intoxicated man is more likely to make an unattractive woman feel attractive, resulting in the proliferation of unattractive, weak self-control genes.

Currently, only a tiny fraction of the population is desirable; as a result, society elevates their wealth and power far above the rest of us, creating a power imbalance. [New State] will take small steps each generation to filter out undesirable traits from the gene pool and proliferate desirable traits.

What is marketable?
Example 1: A person's height. It's important that boys grow to be taller than girls, or that girls don't grow too tall. That's what both sexes prefer. If a girl grows too awkwardly tall or a boy too short, they become less marketable. Perhaps this can be achieved through diet and exercise alone.

Example 2: If everyone in society were only interested in becoming an athlete or musician, would that be a good thing? Of course not; there is a limited need for those types of people. Society needs more problem-solvers. If women mated exclusively with problem solvers, the problem solver population would increase, and the world's problems would be on the way to being solved.

Example 3: Masculine and feminine traits are more marketable than androgynous and all forms of LGBTQ. The mating market will be greatly simplified and work coherently when there are just masculine and feminine.

Total reproductive freedom should not exist in the [New State] system. Reproductive freedom is the cause of many of society's problems. Cooperating members of the [New State] should ensure all children are born free of genetic and biological misfortunes.

When farmers breed cows, they put a cow's sperm under the microscope and notice some sperm are weak because they can hardly swim, some sperm are retarded because they swim in circles, and some sperm just don't look right. Farmers don't leave it to chance; they select the strongest, healthiest sperm to be the new cow. This is one example of a simple filter that, if applied to humans, might go a long way toward improving the human condition.

2. Manage capitalism to fulfill housing, healthcare, and suitable Mate needs.

As the organization of [New State] takes shape, it will provide affordable quality housing, healthcare, and romantic partners (the necessities) to members who follow [New State] values.

These three necessities form the foundation of a family. The family is the basis of society. Because these are biological necessities all people need, they should not be subject to the same capitalist free market forces as all other goods and services.

The [necessities] do not include all other consumer goods and services the average person buys in their life that are subject to capitalist free market forces: transportation, food, entertainment, household appliances, internet, cell phones, computers, clothing, sporting goods, tools, cosmetics, cleaning and gardening supplies, and so on.

This is not a proposal for full and wide-spread changes to capitalism. The goal is political policies and zoning laws whereby housing can be kept affordable to qualifying citizens. For example, one policy would be to protect the border and strictly limit immigration to prevent housing shortages. A zoning law example: neighborhoods that follow [New State] family planning values to encourage the creation of higher-quality citizens and manage population growth. This would be a real working-model social experiment to improve the human condition, just as the United States started off as a social experiment over 200 years ago.

I call this community a "State Nexus,"  or Nexus for short (the central and most important place in society where housing, healthcare, and romantic partners connect). The [Nexus] will be a community of citizens with the shared goal of purchasing and selling housing only to other [Nexus] community members that share the [New State] values to produce an intelligent, attractive, and healthy next generation of citizens. The housing cannot be used as an investment or income property. Profit is not the goal. This will allow citizens to purchase and pay off a home much sooner, thus achieving the American Dream before they are too old to enjoy it.

[New State] will have its own health care system. Members will be born healthier and live by [New State] values, thus making health care simpler and more affordable.

I will discuss more details of this plan in future essays.

3. Create a more objective form of government.

Democracy and the constitution were started by a group of people, some of whom were objective thinkers. Today, democracy in America fails, partly because the majority of voters and politicians are subjective believers, not objective thinkers. See: Objective and Subjective

The election process, thanks partly to the invention of television, has evolved into a two-year-long popularity contest with a silly celebration and dance at the end. This is a highly extroverted affair and reveals the more influential rather than analytical personality traits of those involved in politics today.

The modern world has grown global, complex, and dangerous compared to 200 years ago, when the founding fathers created the Constitution and started American democracy. Without objective thinkers making the decisions, American democracy is now dangerously inadequate.

A new system of government will be developed to bring objective-thinking personality types into decision-making positions. Objective-thinking personality types find themselves in occupations like detectives, scientists, engineers, pilots, financial traders, statisticians, and doctors. As opposed to subjective believer personality types, which are politicians, salespeople, religious leaders, and lawyers, I am speaking in general terms. Not every person in these fields would positively test out the personality type I specified. In short, we need more thinkers and fewer speakers.

Above all, political leaders should know what objectivity means, have excellent reasoning ability, and not mindlessly follow social traditions or beliefs. See my essay: Time to Replace Democracy... I Offer a Bounty!

4. Balance the Mate Market to create true gender equality.

Over the last 10,000 years, the agricultural revolution, technology, the women's movement, and sperm banks have increasingly given women more options, thus reducing their need for men. This has given women a power advantage.

Historically, this power advantage forced men to form a patriarchy to help divide up sexual resources and cover women’s bodies to reduce their sexual power.

Because men are born with a tactile need for women, there has not been a technological solution that would give men the option of bypassing women to have their gender needs fulfilled. The closest technological solution devised is a science fiction concept called the holographic program, as seen in Star Trek and The Matrix. This technology would allow men to design and program their own mate. The realization of this technology could be a hundred years away and still not fully solve society's social problems, many of which are the result of an imbalance of power between the sexes.

The women's movement, which got underway in 1970, started out with good intentions. Before 1970, most women could look forward to spending their lives home alone in the suburbs, raising their kids. However, for many thousands of years, women evolved to be in a group like a tribe or village, with children being raised in part by close relatives. Being alone is unnatural and leads to depression. Meanwhile, an occupation can provide a social life plus the power to independently elevate her own social and financial status.

The women's movement helped make women less dependent on men. A reasonable mind might think that when women earned their own income and provided for themselves, they would no longer expect a man to provide for them, but that never happened. What happened instead was that the majority of women still expect a man to earn at least as much as her, preferably more, and still provide for her. In other words, women are status-driven, and they trade sex for status. women only look up. As a consequence, when women become more successful, men who were their equals drop off their love interest radar.

The women's movement gave women new options: work and be independent, don't work and be taken care of by a man, or some combination of the two. A man still has only one option: he must work, plus now he must compete against women for his livelihood and then turn around and share that very livelyhood with women.

Today, women are free to advertise their sexuality like never before. Sex and business are in close proximity, encouraging many forms of prostitution. For example, women are using the media to leverage their sexuality for financial gain. Ironically, now that women have empowered themselves, a woman is now more likely to perceive men who approach her romantically as creepy because women don't need men and men are starving; men are starving because women are increasing men's frustrations by advertising their sexuality. It's a circle.

All of this has been devastating for Gen X men and men of younger generations. There was no warning by our Dennis the Menace fathers, no plan to maintain social coherence, no guidance, and no change in laws to protect young men. Apparently,  this is not our fathers problem; the Silent Generation and Baby Boomers already have their women. Maybe the (X) in Gen X means experimental. We are the Experimental Generation. The freedom women have to both advertise their sexuality and simultaneously bypass man's number one bargaining power (his ability to provide) has a degrading effect on the male brain.

The imbalance of power between the genders raises the stakes and makes it vastly more difficult and sometimes impossible for the more honest men to compete to fulfill their gender needs, plus it pressures evolution to breed into each generation: boys who's innate inclinations are to compete like social warriors. I think this pressure on young men greatly contributes to the following list of societal ills: pickup artist schools, sexual assault, school shootings and other crime, exotic dance clubs, pornography, gold diggers and prostitutes, sex trafficking, extreme religious beliefs, alcohol, drugs, suicide, and a greater proliferation of those genes or personality traits on the subjective believer side of the personality spectrum. See: Objective and Subjective

[New State] will explore more than one solution to this problem. For example, one solution would be to incentivize women to give birth to fewer boys and more girls, observe how this effects society, and adjust on a continuing basis—each generation—to optimize the fulfillment of the needs of both genders and rid society of prostitution and the rest of the aforementioned ills. Another solution might be to resocialize young women like they do in Sweden and Iceland to give up their pride and meet men halfway in the dating game: instead of waiting, women approach men for dates and pay their own way. Incidentally, pride is a form of dominance.

I will explore other possible solutions in future essays.





END